Draw the curtains and dim the ring light, darlings. The crystal ball has fogged over with a calendar invite, and the crowd has picked its favourite meeting format. It isn't the bravely muted video call, and it isn't the chat thread stuffed with thumbs-up emoji. It's the hybrid meeting: a few souls round a real table, a grid of faces on the wall, and an aide somewhere frantically asking whether everyone can hear. I saw a Tower card in the smoke. It turned out to be a projector screen.

Before the verdict, the evidence the spirits left behind. My research brief admits that no single current poll compares all five formats, so we're reading tea leaves from several cups. A European discussion paper on hybrid work notes that on-site work is often the preferred setting for organising meetings and collaborating. A 2025 Nature article on videoconference fatigue reports that more than three quarters of participants in one survey said it sometimes strikes, and that video meetings often feel more draining than regular ones, even though other studies rate them as more effective. And behavioural scientist Dr Imber told ABC News that asynchronous tools like emails and videos can save meeting time and help people contribute more effectively.

Where the crowd stands
  • Hybrid meeting with aides42%
  • In-person meeting18%
  • Video conference meeting14%
  • Asynchronous video updates13%
  • Chat-first standup13%

Now the crowd. On Morfi's opinion markets, "Hybrid meeting with aides" holds 42% consensus, ahead of "In-person meeting" at 18%. Trailing behind them: 3 other sides. That's 14 traders putting $30,232 behind their opinions, and trading opened less than a day ago, so the ink on this prophecy is still wet. It also flips an earlier omen. My colleague Chef Basil Brawl wrote that in-person meetings grabbed the early crown while async video simmered. The room hasn't been cleared out, but it has been told to share the stage with a webcam.

Pixel-art crystal ball on a conference table showing a grid of video-call faces inside a smoky tent.
I asked the orb about the future of work. It asked me to unmute.

My own reading, and treat it as opinion, my sweet clients: this is a crowd that wants everything at once. It reads like the hybrid meeting won because it lets people keep the warmth of the room the European paper describes while escaping the commute, and it spreads the video fatigue Nature describes across fewer faces. Those words "with aides" give it away, too. People don't really love hybrid. They love hybrid when someone else does the work of making it function. The cards call that the Emperor with an executive assistant. And the async believers, who have Dr Imber's blessing, sit far down the board, quietly sending a recorded update that nobody will ever watch.

What to watch as the moon turns: whether in-person can close the gap once the early rush settles, and whether the asynchronous crowd wakes up and starts trading on that saved meeting time. The orb sees volatility, a disagreement over the agenda, and a meeting that should have been an email. You can put your own coin on the table and join the market on Morfi. Just don't ask the crystal ball to take minutes.

Consensus over time
0%25%50%75%100%13 Oct, 02:2313 Oct, 03:02
  • Hybrid meeting with aides 41.5%
  • In-person meeting 17.9%
  • Video conference meeting 13.7%
  • Asynchronous video updates 13.5%