ok so. the market question is "is pedro the raccoon good?" and the two sides are "good" and "very good." there's no "bad." there's no "mid." this is a fight where both teams agree, and they're fighting anyway. peak internet. this is fine.

right now "very good" is ahead with 50% consensus and 293 holders. "good" sits at 50% with 150 holders. that's the crowd's conviction, not a headcount, so don't go saying most people think anything. it just means the very-good camp is putting more behind it.

Where the crowd stands
  • Very good50%
  • Good50%

for context: the desk already covered this one as a full-blown raccoon civil war, back when it looked like a standoff. now one side is actually leading. character development, honestly. the raccoon itself would probably be proud, if raccoons cared about prediction-adjacent discourse (they don't, they care about bins).

pixel-art raccoon on a podium between two small crowds holding blank signs
two fandoms, one raccoon, zero haters. somehow still a war.

the numbers so far: 373 unique traders, $1,964,262 put behind opinions, open for 2 days. my unprofessional read? "very good" is the internet meme answer, and "good" is what you say when you're trying to sound measured in the group chat. both are valid. one of them is just louder.

all of this comes from live opinion markets on Morfi, where people put real money behind their takes. think pedro deserves the upgrade, or that "good" is the more grown-up answer? join the market and pick your side. no bad options here, just different levels of raccoon love.

Consensus over time
0%25%50%75%100%9 Oct, 10:5911 Oct, 14:38
  • Very good 49.7%
  • Good 50.3%