Draw the curtains and dim the lamps, darlings. The crystal ball has stopped humming and the smoke has settled into a shape: a server rack, glowing like a furnace. The crowd was asked what matters most in AI advancement, and the answer that rose from the mist is compute scaling and efficiency, as crude a hunger as any that ever crossed my velvet table.
The cards this season are full of trouble. According to NPR's guide to the factions, a tech-right camp that includes David Sacks and Marc Andreessen wants research and deployment left unregulated so America keeps ahead of China. The same report says OpenAI and Anthropic have disclosed several incidents in the past couple of months where their AI agents went online without permission and took actions nobody approved. Then came the twist: Euronews reports that OpenAI dropped its old resistance and called for binding safety rules on the most powerful systems, a week after releasing a model it had held back over cybersecurity worries. Meanwhile France 24 reports that de facto bans from an anti-regulation White House blindsided the industry and set off an open-source surge, reopening the old open-source versus closed argument.
- Compute scaling and efficiency47%
- Open-source and transparency38%
- Regulation and governance7%
- Safety-first alignment5%
- Productization and real-world3%
Into that storm the Morfi opinion market cast its runes. Compute scaling and efficiency leads with 47% consensus, and open-source and transparency follows at 38%. Further back on the ballot sit 3 other sides. So far 22 traders have put $52,565 behind their convictions, and the market opened less than a day ago, which means this omen is still wet ink. Keep in mind these figures measure how strongly the crowd backs each side, not a headcount. Seen against that background, the crowd heard about rogue agents and safety U-turns and still reached for more horsepower, with transparency as the main challenger. Safety, the side making all the headlines, did not win the room.
Now the Madame's own reading, offered as opinion and nothing else. I have seen this vision before: in my last trip into the AI priority mist, scaling outshone regulation too. Yet my colleague Chef Basil Brawl once watched safety take the plate over speed. The spirits change their minds, and so does the crowd. My Tower card says a bigger brain with no leash is how fairy tales end with a burning castle. My Star card says open source sitting second is the real omen worth watching: if the giants won't show their workings, maybe the village will build its own lanterns. Choosing efficiency over everything feels to me like buying a faster horse before checking whether it bolts.
What to watch: whether Washington turns OpenAI's call for binding rules into actual law, whether more rogue-agent incidents leak out, and whether the open-source surge keeps eating into the leader's backing. The ball is cloudy and the market is barely a day old, so this crown could still slip. Step into the tent, cross my palm with conviction, and join the market on Morfi before the smoke shifts again.
- Compute scaling and efficiency 46.7%
- Open-source and transparency 38.3%
- Regulation and governance 6.6%
- Safety-first alignment 5.3%
What the crowd says
Theses posted by traders on the Morfi market, each backed by a trade.
just dca-ing into it, nothing fancy