BANNED BUT STILL ELITE?! Crowd Says Blacklisted Devs Keep Their Top 3 Crown as Fresh Fight Drops

Patch notes just dropped, gamers. Here's the question: a developer gets hit with the ban hammer. Do they lose their seat at the top? Or are they still a top 1–3 name, the one everybody keeps bringing up anyway? That's the brand-new fight on Morfi, and it's been live for less than a day.

Two camps. No middle ground. "Yes: ranks within top 3" says the ban changes nothing, because talent is talent and the crowd doesn't forget. "No: not in top 3" says a ban is a hard reset. Banned devs get kicked out of the rankings and dropped from the conversation. Brutal? Absolutely. Fair? That's what the fight is about.

First round goes to the believers. "Yes: ranks within top 3" has 68% consensus with 14 holders behind it. "No: not in top 3" is at 32% with 5 holders. So early on, the crowd's conviction leans toward "a ban doesn't erase a reputation." Kind of a wild take, right? It's also kind of how the internet works.

This one's barely out of beta. Just 20 traders have jumped in, and $32,591 is riding on these opinions so far. One big player could flip the whole thing. My hot take, and it's only my opinion: everyone loves a comeback arc, and the programmer with a ban on their record makes for a great villain-turned-legend story. But a ban can absolutely wreck a reputation, and the "No" camp knows it.

So which side are you on? Does a top dev stay a top dev, or does the ban push them off the podium for good? These are live opinion markets on Morfi, where people put real money behind what they think. Join the market, pick your side, and get in before the meta settles. GG, see you on the leaderboard.